Edinburgh urged to stop building new hotels and 'reimagine' a different future
It has been one of Edinburgh’s most recognisable landmarks for nearly 200 years.
But now the building long touted as a potential home for the Scottish Parliament stands as a symbol of a divided Scottish capital.
Half a century after it was last in proper use, the old Royal High School on Calton Hill is once again facing an uncertain future after a protracted battle to turn it into a luxury hotel was rejected by its near neighbour, the Scottish Government.
The response to a long-awaited ruling from ministers following a public inquiry into its proposed £75 million transformation was unsurprisingly divided, with the developers behind the project dismayed and baffled, while heritage groups and the backers of a rival scheme to turn it into a new home for a music school totally elated.
Meanwhile, the city council, the long-time owner of the building, is still locked into a legal agreement with the hotel developers but under pressure to rip it up to allow the music school development to proceed, and must somehow try to navigate a way forward.
It would be a difficult enough task were opinions not sharply divided on the future of the city centre.
Tensions have been building for several years over Edinburgh’s pursuit of hotel developers and year-round tourism, amid growing concern about the city centre’s ability to cope with the numbers flocking during peak periods, declining numbers of local residents in the face of the growth of Airbnb, and the sustainability of being a global tourism destination in the midst of an escalating climate crisis.
New hotels have long been seen as a potential saviour of Princes Street in the face of fears that the new St James development, which is due to open next year in the city’s end, will draw shoppers and retailers away from the famous thoroughfare.
The scale of the crisis facing the city’s existing hotels was brought into sharp focus this week when a new report revealed that Edinburgh had seen the most dramatic slump in the performance of its hotels of any city in the city, with room rates plummeting by nearly two thirds. News that a planned transformation of the Jenners department store into a hotel had been put on hold is a further body blow.
The city council has just instigated a new masterplan for Princes Street and the adjacent “Waverley Valley”, to take into account the impact of the climate crisis and the pandemic, and ensure a healthy balance” of users is created in future.
Russell Imrie, spokesman for the Edinburgh Hotels Association, said: "The city does not need to change course dramatically as it has been developed over decades to be a destination city. This cannot be changed easily, as the infrastructure of the city is in place to satisfy large-scale tourism.
“However Edinburgh is at a crossroads in terms of tourism. The question is whether the city and the industry will work together to illustrate its value and future potential for Edinburgh’s future success and reinforce the current foundations for future sustainable growth.
“To give recovery a chance, hotels still in the development stage should be paused to allow existing bed stock to utilise any increase in demand as recovery starts. Hotels which are already under construction must continue to completion. However new additional supply should not start until the tourism market recovery has started and stability is returning.”
A new report on post-pandemic Edinburgh, compiled by the heritage group the Cockburn Association states how the “dramatic, global impacts” of the pandemic meant there was a pressing need to “reimagine the future of Edinburgh.”
Chair Cliff Hague said: “Overtourism was a problem, but once the industry was brought to a halt in the spring it became clear that economic over-reliance on tourism was also a problem.
"We firmly believe that a kneejerk attempt to 'get back to normal,' to recover by reheating the growth trajectory of the past decade, would be a dangerous strategy.
"What has not changed is the climate emergency - any recovery that does not address that is no recovery at all. The public health crisis has provided insights into what will happen if existential threats are treated as something that can be ignored until they stare us in the face."
However Roddy Smith, chief executive of business group Essential Edinburgh, said: “What we have seen in recent months is the reliance on a triumvirate of residents, office workers and visitors coming into the city centre for it to thrive.
"The investment in the city in recent years has been on the back of growing tourist numbers, our place as one of the leading cities to visit in the world and our festivals. The city must prioritise the return of tourism as a priority in order to support investment and retain and grow the large number of jobs it supports for residents.
“The pandemic is having a massive impact on the city centre. We all knew that change was underway in the city centre but the pandemic may well have accelerated the move away from just a retail led landscape. Princes Street will need a varied mix of high quality retail and hospitality, accommodation, office, attractions and residential."
Neil Gardiner, the council’s planning convener, said: “One impact of the coronavirus pandemic is that many of us are now questioning how we live, our priorities and how we’re going about our daily lives.
"The Waverley Valley Strategy, which is much needed regardless of these changes, is now even more important to help us shape Edinburgh’s unique city centre with its combination of beautiful built heritage, world-famous attractions and retail. We want to make sure we maintain this diversity and vibrancy.”
A message from the Editor:
Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus impacts our advertisers.
If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.
Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.