Human rights body to rule on how Labour dealt with anti-Semitism controversy

The result of a human rights investigation into how the Labour Party has handled the anti-Semitism crisis that has rocked the party is due to be published later.

The long-awaited release of a report into the situation by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) to be released on Thursday is likely to cause more turmoil in the party’s ranks.

It comes after years of complaints over how allegations of anti-Semitism were dealt with under Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership.

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

The human rights body launched its probe in May 2019 and has looked at the party’s disciplinary processes and response to complaints.

Labour is bracing itself for the result of a human rights investigation into how it has handled the anti-Semitism crisis that has rocked the party. Photo: Shutterstock
Labour is bracing itself for the result of a human rights investigation into how it has handled the anti-Semitism crisis that has rocked the party. Photo: Shutterstock

The Guardian reported the human rights body will recommend an independent complaints system be set up in the wake of the controversy, but that direct disciplinary action against high profile figures in the party should not be taken.

Labour’s shadow health secretary Jonathan Ashworth said, ahead of the release of the report, that the anti-Semitism controversy had been a “shameful” period in the party’s history.

On the eve of its release, former Labour foreign secretary David Miliband said that the way Mr Corbyn dealt with the situation was “appalling” and described the period as a “dreadful, dark, shameful period”.

He told Times Radio: “I’m not going to claim I know what’s in Jeremy Corbyn’s heart.

“What I’m clear about is that he failed to deal with this issue in a way that was appalling in all its aspects.

“Whether it be cartoons or statements, they reflected a complete blindness to the issue and to the importance of it.

“It’s a dreadful, dark, shameful period and the failure to be clear, the failure to be decisive, the failure to say that anyone who is an anti-Semite isn’t welcome in the Labour Party, the failure to clear that out is a source of shame for me as someone who’s still a member of the Labour Party.”

A draft version of the EHRC report was sent to Labour in July as, under the Equality Act 2010, the subject of an investigation by the commission must be given at least 28 days in order to make representations of its findings before the final report is released.

The release comes after Mr Corbyn’s former aide Karie Murphy insisted that the party removed anti-Semites “more quickly, transparently and effectively than ever before” during his tenure.

Sir Keir Starmer, who replaced Mr Corbyn as Labour leader in April, has said tackling the issue of anti-Semitism and rebuilding trust with the Jewish community is a top priority for him.

Both Mr Corbyn and Sir Keir are expected to make statements after the EHRC ruling is made public.

The probe follows a tumultuous few years within the party which has seen some MPs quit its ranks amid claims that allegations of anti-Semitism were not being taken seriously by the leadership of the time.

Allegations involving the former mayor of London Ken Livingstone are believed to be among those examined by the probe.

And veteran MP Dame Margaret Hodge had a robust exchange with Mr Corbyn about his handling of anti-Semitic allegations in the party as he left the Commons chamber in 2018.

It emerged earlier this year that Labour would pay “substantial damages” to whistleblowers who contributed to a TV expose of its handling of anti-Semitism.

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.

 0 comments

Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.