Climate change: How strong whisky helped Scotland's efforts to persuade the world to take action – Dr Richard Dixon

I have a bottle of 42 per cent alcohol ‘Twenty Twenty’ whisky sitting on a shelf at home. It is quite safe because I don’t like whisky.

'Whisky diplomacy' helped make a point about Scotland's carbon-emission reduction targets at the Copenhagen climate change summit in 2009 (Picture: David Cheskin/PA wire)
'Whisky diplomacy' helped make a point about Scotland's carbon-emission reduction targets at the Copenhagen climate change summit in 2009 (Picture: David Cheskin/PA wire)

It is a reminder of the 2009 Copenhagen summit when the world tried and failed to do a new global deal on climate change. That had to wait another six years for the Paris Agreement.

In the run-up to the talks, a group of us where wondering how to publicise the fact that Scotland had just set what seemed like very tough targets, including a 42 per cent reduction in emissions by 2020. The world was in need of good examples and the 2009 Climate Act provided one.

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

We created rather nice badges with a saltire and the message “42 per cent by 2020” and handed them out to official delegates and activists alike in Copenhagen. We got press coverage where we could.

But we also made whisky. The idea originated from my time at the G8 meeting at Gleneagles in 2005. I saw that journalists were being given goody bags with shortbread, tartan pencils and whisky miniatures.

Read More

Read More
Climate change: How the world is seeing rays of hope from unexpected sources – ...

Once I had established that whisky does actually get as strong as 42 per cent alcohol, we knew it might be possible to create something which would communicate our Scottish targets in a uniquely Scottish way.

Mike Robinson, chair of the Stop Climate Chaos Scotland coalition, was the one who actually made the idea a reality, persuading Edrington Distillery to make 470 bottles of Twenty Twenty whisky, with a label carrying the message “Please share Scotland’s ambition, protect the most vulnerable, act fair and fast. We have made the commitments, will you?”

I took it to the G20 finance meeting in St Andrews in November 2009 and made sure the ministers had a bottle each, from Alastair Darling to Christine Lagarde, now president of the European Central Bank.

We shipped hundreds of bottles to the Copenhagen talks and found multiple ways to get it into the hands of people from California Governor Arnie Schwarzenegger and actress Daryl Hannah to actual presidents and prime ministers. We gave some to the Scottish government, and the First Minister presented it to important people he was meeting, so much so that the government started to think that it was their idea.

Did it make a difference? It is impossible to tell. It certainly gained us press coverage, drew attention to Scotland’s strong climate targets and injected something humorous into talks that were otherwise going very badly.

In 2009, targets of 42 per cent by 2020 and 80 per cent by 2050 were worth trumpeting loudly because they were about the best in the world, even if there was no plan proving we could actually meet them.

Yet here we are at the end of 2020 and this year Scotland is very likely to have beaten the 42 per cent target (although we won’t know for 18 months and we’ve moved to a better way of calculating the results which will make comparison with the targets from the 2009 Act complex).

We are now aiming for a 75 per cent reduction by 2030, with a detailed plan on how to get there about to be debated by MSPs. Cheers.

Dr Richard Dixon is director of Friends of the Earth Scotland

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article. We're more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus impacts our advertisers.

If you haven't already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.

 0 comments

Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.