Black Lives Matter: I support the movement but Edinburgh University is wrong about David Hume – Kenny MacAskill

David Hume, the Scottish Enlightenment philosopher, would realise the error of his ways if he were alive today and should not be compared to Bristol slaver Edward Colston, writes Kenny MacAskill

Wednesday, 16th September 2020, 4:45 pm
A poster hangs from the statue of the 18th Century philosopher David Hume on Edinburgh's Royal Mile, following a Black Lives Matter protest rally in June (Picture: Jane Barlow/PA)

As an Edinburgh graduate, the David Hume Tower’s an institution to me. Ugly it may be and my late father bitterly condemned George Square’s desecration by the university authorities, but it still conjours up no image beyond a rather tired building I occasionally frequented or that of the rather corpulent figure now represented in a Royal Mile statue.

The removal of the great philosopher’s name from the building therefore came as a surprise to me. I consider myself a supporter of Black Lives Matter. Racist actions rightly need condemned and symbols that are redolent of it need removed. Toppling Colston from his plinth in Bristol, which along with Liverpool was probably the principle slave port, was therefore long overdue.

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

Read More

Read More
Philosopher joins critics over renaming of David Hume Tower

For names and symbols do matter. Expunging Rhodesia and replacing it with Zimbabwe was essential. I recall being in Charleston, South Carolina many years ago and noting that a statue to Senator John Calhoun dominated the city centre. A prominent supporter of slavery, his monument’s removal is still long overdue, though I’m agnostic about the debate over our own Henry Dundas. I can see arguments for his replacement by one for our radical heroes. But I can live with an adequate explanation being given of his sins both on slavery and against democracy.

However, I hardly think that the grand old man of the Scottish Enlightenment falls into that category. For sure, some things he said are now correctly seen as entirely unacceptable. But we have to differentiate between those who were active promoters of the odious trade and others who were more creatures of their time.

There are plenty things most of us will have said or written over our lives, that we now realise are entirely inappropriate – 1970s TV shows and even newspaper comments testify to the normalisation of what’s now correctly unacceptable. And so, it seems to me it was for Hume. Were he alive today I’ve no doubt he’d reflect and recant far more deeply and thoughtfully than I ever could.

So, leave him alone, there’s a lot wrong with DHT but it’s not the name.

Kenny MacAskill is the SNP MP for East Lothian

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our advertisers - and consequently the revenue we receive - we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.

Subscribe to scotsman.com and enjoy unlimited access to Scottish news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content. Visit www.u2swisshome.com/subscriptions now to sign up.

Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.

Joy Yates

Editorial Director

 0 comments

Want to join the conversation? Please or to comment on this article.